INSIDETRACKAZ.COM MAIL ROOM

We encourage all opinions and viewpoints.  We ask that you keep your submissions under 650 words and, if possible, to send them as email attachments, either as text files or as an MSWord document.  We reserve the right to edit all letters and it will be exclusively our decision whether to run them or not.  All we ask is that you refrain from personal attacks, avoid commercial usage (you need to pay for ads) and try to show some respect for those with differing opinions.  Please be aware that letters that exceed the word length and require excessive reformatting are unlikely to be used.

EMAIL ARCHIVES:  MARCH- JUNE 2004 | JULY - SEPTEMBER 2004 | OCTOBER - DECEMBER 2004

May 12, 2008

Dear News Desk,

I was in court on May 7th when Judge O'Neil made his ruling concerning the San Tan Flat violation of Pinal County Zoning Ordinances. Even though Judge O'Neil ruled in favor of Dale Bell, Judge O'Neil spent a significant amount of time speaking directly to Dale Bell about how the Judge understood the plight of the neighbors near Mr. Bell's establishment, and how Judge O'Neil would be appalled if the County ever allowed an establishment such as Mr. Bell operates, anywhere near the Judge's home in rural Pinal County. Judge O'Neil talked of individual property rights, and the exercise of those property rights as a ‘balancing act’, rubbing together his colliding fists to help demonstrate his point.

It is this 'balancing act' of individual property rights that I would like to address in response to the various articles and editorials that have been published concerning this conflict over the past 2 years.  The primary point I would like to discuss is the very important issue that Judge O'Neil pointed out in court, and that is the balancing act of property rights between property owners.

On one side we find Mr. Bell, operating an establishment that he claims he built following all of the required guidelines and procedures, claiming he has honored all of his commitments, making claims of how good his business is for the 'community', all with what he claims are within his rights as a property owner, and that the County is trying to ‘ban dancing’ in Pinal county.

On another side we find the surrounding property owners, who claim that every Friday and Saturday nights, holiday's nights, and many other nights in between, that Mr. Bell takes over our properties for his own use, blasting unbearable loud noise across our properties and into our homes, shines glaring commercial signage across our properties into the windows of our homes, casts a blanket of smoke across our properties from the marshmallow roasting fires fouling the air our families and livestock breath, and then nightly discharges inebriated patrons onto our neighborhood streets, patrons whom routinely choose our neighborhood streets to avoid encounters with law enforcement with no consideration for the families they put at risk. 

Unlike TV, radio, or the printed media where when you are offended, or tire of it, or find the timing inconvenient, then you can simply switch it off, set it aside, or not buy it in the first place; but here in our neighborhood, only Mr. Bell gets to choose what music and speech we will hear, blasting into our yards, our homes, our lives, night after night, like it or not, want it or not, only Dale Bell gets to choose when and what will be heard for all of the surrounding property owners. 

Now the predominance of the reporting and editorial about this conflict has focused around some injustice being perpetrated against Mr. Bell, which he has spun in the media as an attack on everyone’s right to dance. The candid truth is, we could care less about people dancing in Mr. Bell’s establishment.  I don’t know a one among us who doesn’t like to dance.  Mr. Bell, spun through his current proxies - the various media,  would have us surrender our land, our homes, our dreams, our hopes, to the likes of the blatant recurring trespass from Mr. Bell, that we, Mr. Bell’s neighbors, somehow hold some odd notions of responsible property ownership and appropriate civil behavior, that we have been duped into some kind of flawed thinking about our plight in the face of a bully, that the idea that we might cry foul is somehow wrong, and that it is somehow inappropriate to plead with our elected government to right the wrong, and restore the peace to our neighborhood.

If you remember, we all watched on television as a group of PSYOP soldiers played deafening rock music, 24 hours a day, over loudspeakers that ringed the Vatican Embassy compound where General Noriega had taken refuge. The siege continued until General Manuel Noriega couldn't take the 'constant bombardment of the music' anymore and surrendered. In Iraq, in Fallujah's darkened, empty streets, U.S. troops blast AC/DC's "Hell's Bells" and other rock music full volume from a huge speaker, hoping to grate on the nerves of this Sunni Muslim city's gunmen and give a laugh to Marines along the front line. That is Psychological Warfare Operations.

Granted San Tan Ranches is not a war zone (although some of your readers would like to make it one), and Mr. Bell is not by any stretch of the imagination, a hoard of terrorists bent on killing us all. However, much of the editorial opinion and reporting so far would have us all believe that when our nation’s founding fathers were crafting the Declaration of Independence, that when Thomas Jefferson carefully scribed the concept "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.", that we all must have missed the footnote lay hidden until Mr. Bell came along, that holds an exception - that Mr. Bell somehow enjoys greater privilege over everyone else.  Putting the pun aside, it was this very concept of privilege that our founding fathers found to be so objectionable, so much so, that they were willing to risk everything to protect against it. With the 9th amendment of the US Constitution, the premise of Mr. Bell's extraordinary privilege that some of the editorials would try to convince us all of, is clearly dashed by "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." Mr. Bell's rights clearly end where exercising his rights deny the rights of his neighbors, and that is exactly what Mr. Bell has been doing, continues to do, and is doing so with the support of the media, and particularly unfortunate for our Republic, ‘the press’ - the very place our founding fathers created extraordinary constitutional protections in order to make sure the exchange of ideas would be forever assured.

The elected and appointed government officials in Pinal County, and the State of Arizona, as agents 'of the people, by the people, for the people' have an absolute obligation to protect the rights of 'all of its citizens', setting aside prejudice, special interests, and all other distractions that might interfere with protection of freedom and the fair application of justice, not just for Mr. Bell, but for all of its citizens. Mr. Bell has rights, and so far, the scale for the rights proposition has leaned heavily in Mr. Bell's favor, entirely at the expense of the rights of his neighbors. Mr. Bell is not entitled to the unencumbered use of our neighborhood properties, to use as he currently chooses to, constructively seizing them from us for his own enjoyment and enrichment, and the County through its actions or inaction, cannot surrender our properties to Mr. Bell or allow to continue, Mr. Bell's nightly trespass. That would effectively constitute an unlawful application of eminent domain, the taking of our properties, and handing them over to Mr. Bell, having denied our neighborhood property owners their due legal recourse, compensation and treatment under the law. The County is obliged to restore the "balance" Judge O'Neil referred to in court.

As for the editorial staffs of the press, I say to you: It's time for you and your readers to face up to your own prejudices and misconceptions instead of relying on the propaganda fed to you by Mr. Bell, and recognize the real injustice that is occurring, the real tragedy in our community, the damage Mr. Bell has inflicted on the trust in the press that our founding fathers recognized as so crucial to the survival of our Republic. Mr. Bell has used your publications for his own selfish propaganda.  Regardless how Mr. Bell has portrayed our neighbors in the San Tan Foothills, there are good, hardworking and honorable people here, caring people, and mostly people trying their best to help our community. It would sure be refreshing to see the media, and especially the editorial staffs of the press recognize the real injustice, and finally come to the aid of the neighborhood under siege in the San Tan Foothills.

Respectfully,

Bob Dotson

San Tan Foothills, AZ 85242


2-4-2008

Hi Emil,    Just heard your KVOI editorial on McCain.  Exactly what I've been thinking.    Here's an email I sent to Dean Barnett who fills in for Hugh Hewitt.  It's  similar to what you said.    - Mike    
Hi Dean,    I doubt I will get to call in next time you're on Hugh's show so I wanted to  raise my concerns by email.  I know Hugh and talk radio with the exception  of Medved are going for Romney. 
Hugh has kept his opposition to McCain fairly classy but I think Hugh, Rush, Laura, Sean are all overestimating their influence and the number of Americans that are as conservative as they think.
Here is what I'm afraid is going to happen: The big 10 of conservative talk radio throws its support behind Romney. On Tues. McCain beats Romney by a large margin. The result, talk radio is dismissed as
irrelevant. They seem to think that talk radio is electing the president not the American people. I hate to break it to them but with the exception of Rush most people probably haven't heard of them.
Here in Tucson KVOI that carries Hugh, Prager, Medved isn't even in the top 20 of radio stations. I'm a talk radio junkie and quite conservative but I'm also realistic. We just don't make up a big
enough group of people to swing an election. We need independents and undecided voters. On another note. Why does Hugh bring up Mark Levin like he's a benefit to conservatives? His show is awful!
I don't care who he is or how smart. His show is barely a step above Michael Savage. Guys like that are not going to attract people to being conservative.

9-26-2007

Giffords responded strongly to ad

With reference to Emil Franzi’s column in the Sept. 19 issue of the EXPLORER, Congresswoman Giffords has been anything but tepid in her response to the MoveOn ad.

She has called the ad inexcusable and rejected the attack on Gen. Petraeus. Giffords accepts campaign contributions from numerous organizations which advocate on a wide variety of issues.

She doesn’t agree with all their positions, they don’t agree with all of her positions.

She has shown by her voting record in the Arizona House and Senate as well as in Congress that she is beholden to no organization, whether or not they contribute to her campaigns.

It is interesting to note that the National Republican Congressional Committee has refused to give back money it received from disgraced former Reps. Duke Cunningham, Mark Foley and Bob Ney.

I recommend that voters learn the facts about the congresswoman’s votes and positions.

The best non-partisan, fact-based, non-opinionated source of information is Project Vote Smart, where full voting records are available.

Their website is www.vote-smart.org, and no, I don’t work for them!

Katherine Jacobson,
Tucson

Dear Katherine,

Your attempted apology for Gabby is about as tepid as her response to the MoveOn smear. The "but other kids did it too, mommy" crapola is meaningless, as is the  "Giffords accepts campaign contributions from numerous organizations which advocate on a wide variety of issues. She doesn't agree with all their positions, they don't agree with all of hers."  That's beyond tepid - it's mush-mouthing.

The issue is the outrageous sliming of an American General. That's way beyond differing on an issue. I can assume Gabby wouldn't take money from Hezbollah or the Klan. Please explain why the pusbags at MoveOn are different. Action that could meaningfully modify their wretched action would be to send their money back. Clearly, Gabby is too politically greedy to do that.

I note you chose not to respond to her secret earmarks. Hard to keep track of folks voting records when they hide it, Katherine.

EF


9-24-2007

Emil,  I saw something at work today that I thought you might appreciate. It was a Viet Nam veteran's license plate. Normally such a plate does not interest me much. I could have one on my car too if I was so inclined but I have never felt the need or desire to get one. I don't mind seeing other veterans sporting them because they  earned the right and I'm all for them taking whatever satisfaction they can from the fact. For myself  I have long felt that my tour in the country was pretty easy compared to many and while I was shot at a few times those instances were more of a "to whom it may concern" rather being targeted specifically at me. I was in the field only rarely and spent the majority of my time safe inside the perimeter of the base camp at Cu Chi.

But I saw this car and plate today and had to smile because I know the owner of the car. I work with him every day. His name is Phuoc Le. A small man with a really big smile for everyone. In past conversation he told me that after the fall of the Saigon and the communist takeover of his country he spent 8 years in a "re-education" camp before escaping to the US. He doesn't say much about that period other than to say that he would rather be in his home country than the US but all things considered he is happy to be here.

Anyway I got a smile from his plate. He REALLY IS a Viet Nam vet. The very best kind. Too bad he can't sport his plate in his home country.

Larry


Sent: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 8:42 am
Subject: Arizona law on independents voting in party primaries

Dear Emil, I found your blog via Google, by accident.   I enjoyed your commentary on independent voters in  Arizona gaining on the major parties, and the reasons.   
It is a good column and I agree with everything you  said.  But you should have added that in 2002, the  Arizona Libertarian Party brought a lawsuit, saying  
the First Amendment freedom of association allows a party to refuse to let independents vote in its primary. The US District Court Judge ruled in favor of
the party. The 9th circuit then remanded it back to him and said do it again; you should have distinguished between voting in primaries for party officers
versus public office. We agree that for party office, independents can be kept out; we don't know about public office, and want you to write a new decision
separating out the two. The US District Court Judge, Raner Collins, had been sitting on it for 3 years since then. I guess he can't decide which way to
go, so he does nothing. Do you ever see www.ballot-access.org? I'm sure you remember me. I still live in San Francisco.
Richard Winger

August 25 -

Emil,

 
Here is the link to the TPD Memo of 7 Nov 2006 that specifies that the photo radar van CANNOT be parked illegally.
 
 

The attached file shows the photo enforcement van parked abeam a NO PARKING sign. Mark



August 12,
Thought you would ask. I should have said "violent crimes as reported in the news media". I have been following this for about 3 years. But admittedly, not in a sophisticated way. I do believe the media needs to be reporting whether or not these people are legally here because this is an unfair statement of our legal Hispanic population as stated.  I even had a score card until this year.
Thanks for responding Emil.
Mike Ebert
--------------------------------------

In a message dated 8/11/2007 2:26:05 PM US Mountain Standard Time, ebertsan@msn.com writes:

We have posted your letter on our website. Question -  what is your source for the following?

EF

By the way: about 85% of our local violent crime (Tucson) is perpetrated by people with Hispanic last names

------------------------------------------

August 8

I was listening to your program today. It is important that we address all things illegal. Immigration is big and it will take courage to face this one. But anything short of doing a series of things and quickly, we are accepting some level of anarchy to our rule of law. It doesn't matter whose fault it was. It does matter if we don't fix it. The following is in response to an Andres Oppenheimer article recently.

 
Mike Ebert
 

 
Subject: Fw: Romney & Immigration

This is in response to an Oppenheimer article in the Miami Herald

----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 8:03 AM
Subject: Romney & Immigration

Romney is right on immigration. Citizenship should be considered sacred; an honor to achieve. We should even be taking away citizenship from some people. To honor our flag, laws and our culture should not be too much to ask of anyone claiming to be a citizen. Being American is what make us great. Political correctness and "diversity" will destroy our foundation. All people living here came from other ancestral homes. All of us. What made us great is we came here to have all those rights that were denied us elsewhere. Those that are here illegally are illegally here, whether or not they are colonists, opportunists or Muslims looking to convert us.
You give a name to people who respect American citizenship and our constitution as "anti-immigration zealots"; that is name calling and a disservice to the opposition of that poorly written bill. That was an amnesty bill. Our Southern Arizona Congressman Raul Grijalva also demands that we have a comprehensive immigration bill. He is smart enough to know that idea is impossible. He proved right...but it made for a nice platform.
The will of the American people was felt in that debate and it needs to be honored; that is democracy. I am only one of many who will take offense at your term "anti-immigration zealots".
Please read my "Secure America First" bill and tell my I am "anti-immigration". It does not even get to immigration! All it does address are those activities deemed illegal. Fixing these items is in the best interest of America before proceeding with anything that fast-tracts immigration reform, period.
By the way: about 85% of our local violent crime (Tucson) is perpetrated by people with Hispanic last names. Our left leaning paper will not tell us their immigration status. You can research to find the racial makeup and the population of our city. It is suspected we have an additional 200,000, or more, right here, whom have no intentions of becoming "American".
 
Mike Ebert
Tucson

 


August 5, 2007

 

Hi Emil~
Just wanted to let you know, John and I really enjoyed your guest yesterday.  When my family first moved to Tucson (1956) we lived near Ajo and Mission across the fields from Mary Lynn School in a little adobe house that was probably there when Opha lived in the area.
Love this kind of stuff.
Ann

August 4, 2007

 

Afternoon, Emil . . .
 

This link will take you to the President’s statement the morning after the bridge collapsed. He did NOT blame the Democrats for the collapse. He talked about the FACT that the Democrats have passed none of the appropriations bills this year. The caller was wrong.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/08/20070802-2.html

 
Thank you for your show.
 
Lynne Hubert
Tucson

 

August 4, 2007

 

Hi Emil,
 
Hi Buddy, long time no see, I was listening today and just wanted to drop a note and ell you I was really impressed with Mr. Probasco. It was refreshing to hear the stories if a easier-going Tucson. Would like to hear more of it!
 
Have a great week, and drop me a note sometime, I might like to run some 30 sec spots with ya, email me a rate and we can chat.
 
Thanks!
 
Jeff Conway

 

June 21, 2007

 

Here is an email from a lady who adopted one of the kitties that I fostered. This is why I do what I do :-) (Monica Franzi)

 

Hey there.  Nice to hear from you.  Snickers is doing good.  She was kind of skiddish at first but she seems to be adjusting well.  She loves to sleep in the bed with my son, Kory.  Kory is in a wheelchair (always has been from a birth defect, Spina Bifida) and Snickers seems to realize he is special.  She stays close to him and loves living in his bedroom.  She sits on the window seal and watches the birds and squirrels.  She will remain an inside cat.  We don't want anything to happen to her.  We have a dog who grew up with a kitty and is trying to befriend Snickers---she is gradually getting closer to accepting him, but not quite yet.  So the two of them have only supervised time together.  It is funny that our dog, Beavis, loves cats and wants to be close to her, but she is not quite trusting of him, yet.  We won't push it though, we are gonna let Snickers take her time befriending Beavis.  Well I appreciate the fact that you gave her a foster home until we came to adopt her. Thanks for writing and feel free to keep in touch.  I will put you email address in my address book to contact you and send you some pictures if you like.  Take care. 


June 8, 2007

BUREAUCRATS TO BUCK CONGRESS ON MEXICAN TRUCKS?

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
8 June 2007

CONTACT: Tim Bueler
Media@TimBueler.com

Conducting interviews on this topic is Author Dr. Jerome R. Corsi

By Dr. Jerome R. Corsi

On May 15, when the Safe American Roads Act of 2007 (H.R. 1773) passed the House
by an overwhelming 411-3 margin, many opponents to the Department of
Transportation's Mexican truck demonstration project presumed the battle was
won.

Yet, nothing could be further from the truth.

All this week, a series of Department of Transportation high-level meeting have
been held over a pending decision to allow the Mexican trucks to roll their
long-haul rigs anywhere in the United States on July 15.

A decision to proceed with the Mexican truck demonstration project amounts to
Transportation declaring that the agency has already complied with the
requirements of the Iraq supplemental funding bill and ignoring an overwhelming
vote taken by the House to pass a law that would block the test.

Todd Spencer, executive vice president of the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers
Association, has asked the Department of Transportation to announce publicly
whether the demonstration project will begin on July 15, or to state officially
that the project allowing Mexican trucks into the U.S. has been postponed.

"How many times will DOT and the Bush administration thumb their noses at
Congress and the American people," Spencer asked in a telephone interview
yesterday. "That DOT would even consider starting the Mexican trucking company
demonstration project now is brazen and outlandish, especially after the
important safety requirements put in place by the Iraq supplemental funding bill
and the Safe American Roads Act passed by the House. Doesn't the vote taken in
the House mean anything to DOT?"

Those within the department pushing to start the Mexican truck demonstration
project argue that the Senate has not acted on the Safe American Roads Act of
2007, and there is no certainty President Bush would sign the bill or that
Congress would override a veto. So, why not go ahead instead of waiting on the
hypothetical possibility that the bill might become law?

In a similar vein, the Transportation Department is also considering brushing
aside a provisions in the Iraq emergency funding legislation (H.R. 2206) signed
into law by President Bush May 25 that require DOT to validate that a series of
safety concerns have been satisfactorily resolved.

Supporters within the agency pushing the project argue that the May filing by
the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration in the Federal Register
satisfied the H.R. 2206 requirements to post safety regulations that meet the
requirements of the inspector general for the test to begin.

"It is absolutely stunning that DOT would even consider going ahead after all
Congress has done to block the Mexican trucking company demonstration project,"
Spencer said.

"The supplemental funding bill demanded verification of safety issues that DOT
did not provide in their Federal Register filing," Spencer stressed. "If DOT
wants to comply with the law, there is really no alternative but to declare that
the Mexican trucking demonstration project has been officially put on hold until
the new legal requirements are met."

As WND previously reported, Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters announced
April 30 that Mexico will open to U.S. trucks at the same time we open the U.S.
to Mexican trucks, meeting an additional requirement imposed by the Iraq
supplementing funding bill provisions.

Henry Jasny, general counsel for Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety, a
highway safety advocacy group, said in a telephone interview the group filed a
Freedom of Information Act request with the Department of Transportation in
October 2006, seeking to obtain agency records on any possible Mexican truck
pilot test the agency might be planning.

In March 2007, the group sued DOT after the agency had failed to turn over any
documents as requested.

Jasny said DOT has made a motion to have the request stayed for 18-24 months,
claiming that amount of time is necessary to get the documents together.

"The request for that much time is absurd," Jasny said. "The amount of documents
that could be covered by our FOIA request should not take that much time to get
together, especially in a day when most documents are electronic."

"I think DOT wants to get the Mexican truck demonstration project started before
they supply any documents," Jasny concluded.

The White House and the Department of Transportation declined to comment for
this column.


June 7, 2007

 

 

 


 

 

April 21, 2007

 

Sorry that I couldn't respond to your guest on his global warming rant. He didn't answer the question posed by a caller who identified himself as an engineer. I'm dissapointed Tom couldn't muster up the courage to challange the guest's response.
What is the total greenhouse gas going into the atmosphere and what percent is due to man's activities?
To call on "science" as if it existed in some place and was monolithic is to ignore much of the contributions of many: some good, some not so good and some very bad.
 
For starterd read Professor Richard S. Linzer of MIT whose article in Newsweek International (not the US edition) who states the debate is not over.
An article in a recent Scientific American issue on methane gas indicates how only very recently this gas has become understood to be a large contributor to greenhouse gases.
 
But so what? Who can say with ANY certainty what the consequences will be. Warming may be a good thing.
 
Read  Chistopher  Horner's 'Politically Incorrect Guide to Global Warming' to get an idea of how complex this subject is and also how the simplistic approach your guest of today only furthers the confusion.
 
Ed Prieve

 

 

I am usually polite but firm with guests I with whom I disagree. This one wasn't as bad on the ssue as most of the others who are basically secular religious fanatics who actually hate and wish to punish the heretics. He at least TRIED to prove a point. Most Globalians don't think they have to.

EF




In a message dated 3/10/2007 5:42:56 PM US Mountain Standard Time, dcheeseman3@mac.com writes:


we as citizens need to try and show respect for the office 
and position. Amil the same goes for you - the comments and pure 
hatred for Raul G. just bleeds through. Do I feel Raul is competent 
to hold the office - Hell No! But you will never hear me take a shot 
at his dignity. I am no alter boy but every year we had to sign a 
"Protection of the President Oath" - while I never agreed with 
President Clinton's morals - I respected the Office of President and 
if a lawful order was given by the constitution and rule of our 
country's laws it was executed.



And as a member of the United States military that was your obligation. As a member of the media and as a private citizen I have a different standard. That Raul isn't competent to hold office is evidenced by his flaunted public drunkeness. The media plays "Emporer's New Clothes" and with the exception some years back when the Tucson Weekly had an editor with some guts named Dan Huff, they enable him to continue by failing to jack him up on that and other subjects.

I have worked in politics for many years and known functional alcoholics and secret alcoholics, some of whom were actually decent people who did a pretty good job. That doesn't include Raul who consistently shows up at public functions in the bag and with the stink of booze all over him. In this and other ways he debases his office and it is the media's role to present it not kick it under the rug.

This has nothing to do with his politics. I know and respect many in the center left including Tom and Mike who I've shared mikes with for years and who are both friends and decent people - if often wrong-headed. I consider Ed Pastor an under-rated and decent Congressman and believe that Harry Williams was a pretty good Tempe Mayor and is an OK guy. One more time - Gabby is a cliche repeating airhead.

When I started in this game some 40 odd years ago the AZ Congressional House delegation was but three - John Jacob Rhodes, Morris King Udall, and Sam NMI Steiger. We have yet to produce anyone equalling any of them, although Flake and Shadegg may get there. That the district once represented by the great Mo Udall has degenerated to a falling down drunk and a pathetic little rich girl who speaks in talking points indicates how much trouble the republic faces. That the local media gives both a pass may be a clue as to why.

Thank you for your comments and for your service.

EF


 

March 2, 2007

 

Take My Civil Liberties. I Wasn't Using Them Anyway

 

Emil Franzi hopes he’s wrong (Inside Track: Pathology and porn at the local library, February 28, 2007). I can assure him that he is.

 

I’m surprised that Franzi, who likes to ridicule what he calls “the nanny state” (Inside Track, January 31) is so enthusiastic over its latest incarnation. One Internet filtering tool that I actually used when my children were young is even called “Net Nanny.”

 

If Internet filters successfully blocked “porn” and only “porn,” I would have no problem requiring them for computers in libraries. As a mother who used the filters at home with her growing children, and as an Internet professional with a Master’s degree in Technical Communication management, I know that the filters don’t work. They both under-filter (allowing access to objectionable sites) and over-filter (blocking access to perfectly legitimate sites). Because of that, they offer a false sense of security that children are not going to be exposed to objectionable material. As Councilmember Kunish remarked on November 15, “Libraries have never been a safe place for unsupervised children.” And the filters don’t make them safe.


Franzi wrote, “A reasonable initial response questions the use of blocking software because it blocks other things.” I agree that’s a reasonable concern, and it’s one of mine. Franzi writes of a friend, whose “unit re-union was unreachable on a Tucson library computer” because “they were blocking patrons from online gaming.” Hmm. So the filters are not just set up to block “porn,” but apparently, they are, indeed, set up to block other things as well.

Franzi wrote, “The inconvenience seems relatively minor and hardly a constitutional question…Asking librarians to lift the block for purposes OTHER than porn doesn’t seem any harder than asking for a book not easily accessed.” But it will be harder if Vice Mayor Dankwerth’s suggestion is passed by the Council. She wants the town’s librarians to check a list of known sex offenders every time someone asks for unfiltered Internet access. What that means is that your friend, my fellow Air Force veteran, would have to prove that he is not a sex offender in order to find out about his military reunion. If Mr. Franzi doesn’t think that’s wrong, then we disagree. He and I are lucky that we have unique names, but perhaps his friend isn’t so lucky, and might have to go through the humiliation of trying to explain that he isn’t the person on the list of sex offenders.

 

Franzi fears that “Library porn may be an issue in the 2008 election for both the Pima County Board of Supervisors and the Oro Valley council.” That will be true only if he continues to make it one. I can understand how that is easier than actually picking up the phone to speak with me, reading my news release, or even checking out my Web site (www.votelatas.com). If Mr. Franzi took the time to do any of those things, he would understand that I am not “tied to” this issue at all. If his intent is to keep citizens from ever speaking out on their personal and professional experiences with something under consideration by the Town Council, shame on him. That’s how we end up with politicians like the one he calls a “cliché laden airhead.” But if his intent was to try to create some controversial buzz around an otherwise non-controversial candidate, then I can appreciate his efforts.

 

Franzi writes, “Salette, get off it.” I have. I did not speak at the meeting when the filters became mandatory for adults. I learned months ago that it's just too difficult for most people to understand why the filters don't work, why they don't make unsupervised children any safer in the library, or why an 80-year-old woman researching breast cancer shouldn't have to have her name checked against a list of known sex offenders in order to use the computer. That’s why all I asked for in November was to have more citizen input, such as our own library board.

 

Right now, it’s more important for me to listen to residents who believe that the Town Council is giving away our town’s unique character to outsiders who want to make Oro Valley into a miniature Phoenix full of chain stores and restaurants, and pay for rampant growth with a utility tax. Emil, please realize that the Internet filters are a wedge issue, and I hope that you are not falling into that pathology of the right: continuing to bring up wedge issues so that we don’t have to discuss the issues that are really important.

 

I know that unique, sustainable shops, restaurants, and historic sites will make Oro Valley a destination and increase the town’s income without raising taxes. My campaign priorities are to listen and respond to community needs, protect our quality of life, and comprehensively plan for the future.

 

Salette Latas

Oro Valley


 

 

 

February 13, 2007
 

Thanks, Jack.  Got lots of comments on my blunder. Kinda tells you who listens.
 
EF
 
Emil
I agree with you about Law & Order: biased and just full of themselves. In reference to their 357 Glock comment:, well there are three Glock models, #31 & #32 & #33 that use the 357 Sigg. I tried one a couple of weeks ago, along with a 10mm Glock.  I carry as my c & c weapons a S & W 357 as well as a Colt Python, and I wanted to try the larger caliber Glocks. I'm not partial to a pistol, but I thought I'd give them a go. They were very accurate, but I decided to stay with my wheel guns. The 10 mm was very powerful. Anyway, as always love your show.
Jack Friedman   

February 8, 2007
 

This is an amazing, uplifting story. Thought you might enjoy reading it. 
 
G. 
 
Glenn Goldstein 

 
 
August 1942. Piotrkow, Poland. 
 
The sky was gloomy that morning as we waited anxiously. All the men, women and children of Piotrkow's Jewish ghetto had been herded into a square. Word had gotten around that we were being moved. My father had only recently died from typhus, which had run rampant through the crowded ghetto. My greatest fear was that our family would be separated. 
 
"Whatever you do," Isidore, my eldest brother, whispered to me , "don't tell them your age. Say you're sixteen". 
 
I was tall for a boy of 11, so I could pull it off. That way I might be deemed valuable as a worker. An SS man approached me, boots clicking against the cobblestones. He looked me up and down, then asked my age. 
 
"Sixteen," I said. He directed me to the left, where my three brothers and other healthy young men already stood. 
 
My mother was motioned to the right with the other women, children, sick and elderly people. I whispered to Isidore, "Why?" He didn't answer. I ran 
to Mama's side and said I wanted to stay with her. 
 
"No," she said sternly. "Get away. Don't be a nuisance. Go with your brothers." She had never spoken so harshly before. But I understood: She was 
protecting me. She loved me so much that, just this once, she pretended not to. It was the last I ever saw of her. 
 
My brothers and I were transported in a cattle car to Germany. We arrived at the Buchenwald concentration camp one night weeks later and were led 
into a crowded barrack. The next day, we were issued uniforms and identification numbers. 
 
"Don't call me Herman anymore." I said to my brothers. "Call me 94983." 
 
I was put to work in the camp's crematorium, loading the dead into a hand-cranked elevator. I, too, felt dead. Hardened, I had become a number. Soon, my brothers and I were sent to Schlieben, one of Buchenwald's sub-camps near Berlin. One morning I thought I heard my mother's voice. Son, she said 
softly but clearly, I am sending you an angel. Then I woke up. Just a dream. A beautiful dream. But in this place there could be no angels. There was only work. And hunger. And fear. 
 
A couple of days later, I was walking around the camp, around the barracks, near the barbed-wire fence where the guards could not easily see. I was 
alone. On the other side of the fence, I spotted some! one: a young girl with light, almost luminous curls. She was half-hidden behind a birch tree. I 
glanced around to make sure no one saw me. I called to her softly in German. 
 
"Do you have something eat?" She didn't understand. I inched closer to the fence and repeated question in Polish. She stepped forward. I was thin and gaunt, with rags wrapped around my feet, but the girl looked unafraid. In her eyes, I saw life. She pulled an apple from her woolen jacket and threw it over the fence. I grabbed the fruit and, as I started to run away, I heard her say faintly, "I'll see you tomorrow." 
 
I returned to the same spot by the fence at the same time every day. She was always there with something for me to eat - a hunk of bread or, better yet, an apple. We didn't dare speak or linger. To be caught would mean death for us both. I didn't know anything about her just a kind farm girl except that she understood Polish. What was her name? Why was she risking her life for me? Hope was in such short supply, and this girl on the other side of the fence gave me some, as nourishing in its way as the bread and apples. 
 
Nearly seven months later, my brothers and I were crammed into a coal car and shipped to Theresienstadt camp in Czechoslovakia. 
 
"Don't return," I told the girl that day. "We're leaving." 
 
I turned toward the barracks and didn't look back, didn't even say good-bye to the girl whose name I'd never learned, the girl with the apples. 
 
We were in Theresienstadt for three months. The war was winding down and Allied forces were closing in, yet my fate seemed sealed. On May 10, 1945, 
I was scheduled to die in the gas chamber at 10:00 AM. 
 
In the quiet of dawn, I tried to prepare myself. So many times death seemed ready to claim me, but somehow I'd survived. Now, it was over. I thought of my parents. At least, I thought we will be reunited. 
 
At 8 A.M. there was a commotion. I heard shouts, and saw people running every which way through camp. I caught up with my brothers. Russian troops had entered the camp! The gates swung open. Everyone was running, so I did too. 
 
Amazingly, all of my brothers had survived; I'm not sure how. But I knew that the girl with the apples had been the key to my survival. In a place where 
evil seemed triumphant, one person's goodness had saved my life, had given me hope in a place where there was none. My mother had promised to send me an angel, and the angel had come. 
 
Eventually I made my way to England where I was sponsored by a Jewish charity, put up in a hostel with other boys who had survived the Holocaust and trained in electronics. Then I came to America, where my brother Sam had already moved. 
 
I served in the U. S. Army during the Korean War, and returned to New York City after two years. By August 1957 I'd opened my own electronics repair shop. I was starting to settle in. 
 
One day, my friend Sid who I knew from England called me. "I've got a date. She's got a Polish friend. Let's double date." 
 
A blind date? Nah, that wasn't for me. But Sid kept pestering me, and a few days later we headed up to the Bronx to pick up his date and her friend Roma. I had to admit, for a blind date this wasn't so bad. Roma was a nurse at a Bronx hospital. She was kind and smart. Beautiful, too, with swirling brown curls and green, almond-shaped eyes that sparkled with life. 
 
The four of us drove out to Coney Island. Roma was easy to talk to, easy to be with. Turned out she was wary of blind dates too! We were both just doing our friends a favor. We took a stroll on the boardwalk, enjoying the salty Atlantic breeze, and then had dinner by the shore. I couldn't remember having a better time. 
 
We piled back into Sid's car, Roma and I sharing the back seat. As European Jews who had survived the war, we were aware that much had been left unsaid between us. She broached the subject, "Where were you," she asked softly, "during the war?" 
 
"The camps," I said, the terrible memories still vivid, the irreparable loss. I had tried to forget. But you can never forget. 
 
She nodded. "My family was hiding on a farm in Germany, not far from Berlin," she told me. "My father knew a priest and he got us Aryan papers." 
 
I imagined how she must have suffered too, fear, a constant companion. And yet here we were, both survivors, in a new world. 
 
"There was a camp next to the farm." Roma continued. "I saw a boy there and I would throw him apples every day." 
 
What an amazing coincidence that she had helped some other boy. "What did he look like?" I asked. 
 
He was tall. Skinny. Hungry. I must have seen him every day for six months." 
 
My heart was racing. I couldn't believe it. This couldn't be. 
 
"Did he tell you one day not to come back because he was leaving Schlieben?" Roma looked at me in amazement. 
 
"Yes," That was me!" 
 
I was ready to burst with joy and awe, flooded with emotions. I couldn't believe it. My angel. 
 
"I'm not letting you go." I said to Roma. And in the back of the car on that blind date, I proposed to her. I didn't want to wait. 
 
"You're crazy!" she said. But she invited me to meet her parents for Shabbat dinner the following week. There was so much I looked forward to learning about Roma, but the most important things I always knew: her steadfastness, her goodness. For many months, in the worst of circumstances, she had come to the fence and given me hope. Now that I'd found her again, I could never let her go. That day, she said yes. And I kept my word. After nearly 50 years of marriage, two children and three grandchildren I have never let her go. 
 
Herman Rosenblat 
Miami Beach, Florida 
 
This is a true story and you can find out more by googling Herman Rosenblat as he was bar mitzvahed at age 75 

 


January 30, 2007

 

Hi Emil,

Here's the letter you asked me to send:

Emil Franzi's column ("Why 'consensus' is a dangerous concept," Jan. 24) mistreats consensus as if it is inherently dangerous, which it is not, and then asserts that there are no consensuses in the reputable scientific community about evolution and global warming, which there are.

Consensus is categorically neither "dangerous" nor safe, good nor evil. Before Copernicus, there was consensus that the sun revolved around the Earth, which was incorrect. Now, there is consensus, based on the overwhelming scientific evidence, that the Earth revolves around the sun, which is correct. Still, it appears that Mr. Franzi would prefer to have a few geocentric loonies around to voice their inane opinions just so occasionally evil "consensus" could receive a sharp kick in the shins.

Pursuing this vein, Mr. Franzi tries to deny the consensuses among the reputable scientific community in the subjects of evolution and global warming. Excepting a few from the right-wing religious fringe, and some pseudo-science bought and paid for by the oil and gas industry, there is consensus that life on earth evolved over eons and human activities are raising Earth's temperatures at a rate that, if not soon addressed, will prove disastrous during present lifetimes.

When a theory has been verified over and over by the accumulation of mountains of evidence, dogma is replaced by consensus. And that is a "dangerous concept" only to those whose ideological, dogmatic politics are not reality-based.

Grant Winston

 


January 26, 2007

 

I don't know much about this guy, but the Daley connection on Obama is interesting. EF

To: Editorial Dept. 
Re: Submission for publication (Permission granted to publish.)
Contact for verification purposes: 847-274-8814 

BIG MONEY, CORRUPT POLITICIANS AND BARACK OBAMA
By John Cox (298 words)

The current trend of moving up the 2008 Primary Election dates perpetuates the influence of big money and corrupt politicians. This is best illustrated in my home state of Illinois, which is trying to move its Primary to ‘game the system’ and help the Democrat ‘media celebrity’ Barack Obama. Senator Obama recently endorsed Mayor Daley in his reelection for mayor of the City of Chicago, overlooking the fact that the mayor has had many members of his administration convicted of corruption in the past several years. This endorsement of an ‘ethically challenged administration’ certainly contradicts Senator Obama’s image as a ‘political reformer’. 
Daley has been under fire the past several years for a succession of his top aides getting caught in corruption scandals. The mayor, who controls one of the biggest and most corrupt big city political machines in the nation, is using his muscle to help Obama. And Senator Obama continues to look the other way, hypocritically endorsing a mayor who has such ethical lapses. 
The addition of other large states with expensive media markets early in the primary season only adds to the perception that the presidential election process is now in the hands of big money  political elites, some with a history of corrupt administrations, who are trying to game the system to benefit the candidates they control who have the most money and name recognition. 
The end result is one more huge step backward for our democracy and one huge step forward for the power-hungry elites who want to control the process and dictate who will be the next president, ‘The best president money can buy.’
This is a sad development for those Americans who desire positive change and statesmanship along with an end to the reign of the corrupt career politicians in Washington. 

--John H. Cox 

ABOUT JOHN COX…
John H. Cox, 51, is the first announced Republican candidate for president in 2008. He has active campaign organizations in 33 states and county coordinators in 70 percent of counties in early primary and caucus states Iowa, New Hampshire and South Carolina. He is a CPA, real estate broker, attorney and investment advisor. He is the former president of the Cook County (IL) Republican Party. John Cox lives in Chicago, IL with his wife and four daughters. For more information, visit www.cox2008.com 

John H. Cox 
Chicago, Illinois
Republican Candidate for President of the United States

 

January 19, 2007

 

Every time I have had a job, my trade deficits with various and sundry merchants has increased. Everytime I have been unemployed, my trade deficits have decreased.   Once, when I was flat broke, I actually had a trade surplus.   That is what happens when you sell/pawn belongings just to make ends meet.

 

And one other thing:  A "foreign debt" is when you owe money in somebody else's currency and is a problem only when your currency has trouble buying enough of their currency to make payments.   The nationality of the creditor is unimportant.

 

William Hanley
 


Some pictures from my last trip. One of the pictures was of "Cummings
the Bomb Dog". He came along with us on one of the Chinooks to Warhorse
at Bukaba. He didn't like the sound of the rotors though. There's a look
at some of our "accommodations" in theater and a reenlistment ceremony
we performed today for two of my NCOs at Camp Slayer. 
~Jonathan Paton

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
If this e-mail is marked FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY it may be exempt from
mandatory disclosure under FOIA. DoD 5400.7R, "DoD Freedom of
Information Act Program", DoD Directive 5230.9, "Clearance of DoD
Information for Public Release", and DoD Instruction 5230.29, "Security
and Policy Review of DoD Information for Public Release" apply.


 


 

 
|
|

|

 


"Caller thought Boxer was libDem who blew prosecution in CA by running off at the mouth. One time Diane was dumb as Barabara."

EF

 

It Was Feinstein!

Not much out there on this any more Emil, but it was Feinstein not Boxer.

Can you believe she's on the Senate Intelligence committee???

Michael

Tucson

http://beautifulatrocities.com/archives/2005/05/a_message_from_2.html

Posted by: beautifulatrocities [TypeKey Profile Page] at May 24, 2005 03:48 PM

When I consider that Boxer makes Feinstein look good, I want to cry: after all, Feinstein wrote legislation about what constituted an "assault weapon" by looking through gun catalogs and deciding what was ugly/threatening-looking.

And Feinstein is the genius who publicized the evidence SF police had to identify the nightstalker (Richard Ramirez). She announced that they knew the guy in SF was Ramirez because of his shoes. Naturally, he destroyed the shoes. What an idiot.

We in the Golden State have seriously got to get our stuff together.


Steve..

THANK YOU!

It was interesting that the lady guest was provided by a regular service we use thaty sends us folks who are left of center. They are supposed to be the real "conservationists".

OK - so the water went by and wasn't placed in some of form of pond. How much of it will eventually reach the local aquafir, howh muc will run off elsewhere,  and how much will simply evaporate?

EF

January 15, 2007
More would enter the into the Tucson aquifer as it is not charging by
at 10 miles an hour but soaking in, a little less would be run off into
the desert but not stopped by spill damns. Remember it was only one day
of flow and it rained and flowed for many days over the monsoon period.
Finally about the same will simply evaporate whether in the desert or
in a lake. 

Another Knee jerk is that the arroyo`s have trash and maybe car
batteries in them, polluting the water. Volunteer environmentalist
groups surely would want to clean these arroyos. I am surprised they
haven`t organized that as they have been complaining about it for
decades. I guess its easier to just leave them that way and let the
desert animals and the aquifer deal with the toxins.

Please note: message attached

How much of it will eventually reach the local aquafir, howh muc will
run off elsewhere,  and how much will simply evaporate?

January 13, 2007

Dear inside track,

As I was trying to explain. My wife who is the water resource Manager
for the State figured out that on that single day in August more water
flowed through the river than was used in an entire year of usage by
the city of Tucson.
Furthermore it would could have filled 3 reservoirs had they been in
existence along the Rio Neuvo to Marania on that single day. All the 2
weeks excess rain could have been allowed to over flow with the proper
damn into the desert. 
Unfortunately the environmentalist here have a knee jerk reaction and
dismiss out of hand any idea of conserving water this way. All they
know is the 55 gal. barrel rain catching that My wife helped make policy.

Steve

January  6, 2007

 

 

THE MYTH OF THE MINIMUM WAGE

__________________________________________________________
 

Many members of Congress have displayed a remarkable ability to scheme and to appear learned by rationalizing thoughtlessness in a logical sounding way.  While most politicians appear to be fooling themselves with their meaningless oratory, the voters are not fooled, just distressed.  On the 2006 Election Day the distraught voters without any other available alternatives, voted for change -- not necessarily for Democrats.

 

But to most Democrats the outcome of the election apparently indicated that the voters approved of the Democrat Party’s slithering deeper into liberal socialistic ideology.  It wasn't realized that a deep reservoir of voters’ disgust had surfaced because members of Congress, on both sides of the aisle for a long time, have not displayed a capacity to reason in depth.  Shallow thinking has hindered them from being able to visualize the cumulative side effects and long-term consequences of their inadequately thought out propositions and maze-like legislations.  Politicians seem to be unaware of the silent majority's opinion of them because hard-working taxpayers know that it is a waste of time to attempt to reason with unreasonable politicians.

____________________________________________________________

 

Presently, the Democrats feel pressed to promptly show that they can actually do something.  Raising the minimum-wage appears to be an easy one to hang their hat on without shouldering the responsibility of having to think it through.  It would seem that raising the Minimum Wage should raise the financial well-being for working people on the lower end of the wage scale.  But after a minimum wage increase works its way through the economic system the minimum-wage employees, as well as all wage earners above the minimum wage level end up financially worse off with less buying power.  This happens because prices have to be raised to pay for increased wages.  A minimum-wage-increase tips off a domino effect that ripples through out the economy causing a sequence of price/wage increases that raises the cost-of-living for everybody, and climaxes in an inflationary spiral

 

This is how it works:  The prices charged for the things that we buy in stores, order from manufacturers, pay for farm produce, for food in restaurants, as well as, for services must incorporate all the costs and expenses for operating a business such as: wages, employee benefits, rent, property taxes, utilities, advertising, supplies, insurance, equipment, workman’s compensation taxes, Federal and state unemployment taxes and half the employees’ FICA and Medicare taxes, government paperwork, etc.  Prices must be continually adjusted to cover all the current operating expenses.  The prices charged for goods and services must be increased by the same amount required to pay the increase of a higher minimum wage and consequent taxes.  The result is that a Minimum-Wage-increase is cancelled out by increased prices -- a zero gain.  But it does not end there.

 

As a consequence of a minimum-wage-increase the pay scale of all employees above the minimum-wage level must correspondently be adjusted upward.  This is necessary to maintain uniformity of pay scales, and satisfy the demand for higher wages to make up for the price upsurge for goods and services set in motion by raising the minimum-wage. This chain reaction of wage/price increases generates an across-the-board price rise for goods and services.  This culminates into an out of control chain reaction – an inflationary spiral with a life of its own that raises the cost-of-living for everyone. 

 

The financial well-being of minimum-wage employees is harmed not helped by the inflation that is set off by minimum-wage-increase legislation. In addition the upward scramble of wage increases in turn drives up the amount of Income Taxes and FICA taxes wage earners have to pay leaving them worse off than before the minimum-wage increase.  Adding insult to injury these taxes go back to feed the already bloated government that started it all to get votes. 

 

Minimum-wage increase legislation is one of the ways runaway inflationary spirals have been started.  Similarly inflationary spirals have been set off by wage increases and benefits demanded by unions.  Both hurt the workers by driving up the cost of living. The end result is: American jobs are often lost to lower-priced workers outside of the country in order for American companies to stay in business and vie with foreign competition.

 

The free market economic theory, called capitalism in academia, is not an invention of academic economists, but the way people have historically lived.  By natural inborn instinct, they made things, bartered, and traded with each other.  Free market economic activity is instinctive human behavior -- natural, straightforward, and simple.

 

But those that have never experienced being productive by working in real jobs or running a business -- like many university professors, academic economists, as well as, federal, and state government politicians -- imagine that they know better than the American people who do the actual work or run businesses.  Under the illusion that government, guided by academic economists, knows best they complicate, confuse, and instigate obstacles to control the naturally operating economy with endless rules and regulations that push up prices and the cost of living.  Inadequately thought out economy regulating legislation puts hobbles on the free market and drives down the Gross Domestic Product.  The GDP is the basis from which government derives its livelihood, income taxes -- killing the goose that lays the golden egg.  Stifling the free enterprise based economic system with needless rules and regulations is a self-defeating practice that lowers government revenue thereby enlarging the massive National Debt.

 

Deficit spending also creates inflation.  Instead of reducing the size of bloated government bureaucracies as a way to lower the daily cost of operating the government and reduce the National Debt, the government prints more money to pay its bills.  The newly printed money is circulated through the complex Federal Reserve system -- a labyrinth that politicians do not understand. It's like trying to make something out of nothing.  Printing more money increases the supply of money in circulation.  The principle of supply and demand comes into effect and the value of the dollar is devaluated in America and worldwide.  In America as the dollar is devaluated, prices have to be raised by merchants, manufacturers, etc. to make up for the dollar having less value -- inflation.  Internationally as the prices of our products go up, foreign buyers go elsewhere, and our balance of trade goes deeper into the negative.

 

 Summary: Wage scales are determined by a natural balance based upon workers’ abilities and number of available workers (supply and demand).  Free enterprise arises from the law of nature that all living creatures are responsible for themselves.  For that reason a person’s success and financial well-being are achieved by hard work and learning employable skills. The minimum-wage theory conflicts with this natural law.  An individual entering the job market must face the challenges of the real world as they are.  When these challenges are softened with minimum wage legislation, government benefits, and credit cards, the individual is denied learning experiences necessary to build a solid foundation for his or her life’s work -- determined character and good work habits. 

 

Basic economic principles are very simple.  But regrettably are beyond the experience and knowledge of many Congressional intellectualistic silk-stocking elitists.  The Democrat Congress’s haste to attain voter approval by sponsoring a minimum-wage-increase bill without thinking it through is a serious mistake destined to come back to haunt them.  Raising the minimum wage will backfire for the following reasons: (1) It financially harms rather than helps the low-wage earner.  (2) It causes prices to be raised to pay for the minimum-wage increase.  Higher prices trigger demands for wage increases throughout the economy setting off an inflationary spiral.  (3) It pushes up rates for workman’s compensation, FICA, Medicare, and unemployment taxes that are adjusted upward with wages and paid by the employer. To get the money to pay for these higher taxes on top of the wage increases, employers are forced to raise prices -- raising the cost of living for everyone. (4) It causes American jobs to be lost to lower-priced workers outside the country, along with worsening the US negative balance of trade.  (5) It will encourage more illegal aliens to enter our country, because they can undercut higher wage brackets and earn more money than before enactment of a higher minimum wage.  (6) It diminishes senior citizens’ retirement savings because of increased cost-of-living related to inflationary minimum-wage hikes.  It is predictable that the sizable senior citizen vote (many more than the low income voters) will be lost to the unwitting Democrats that imposed an inflationary higher minimum-wage on the economy.

 

Our enemies know that our military might depends upon the vitality of our economy.  That is why the terrorists twice plotted to bring down the World Trade Center where many businesses had their main offices.  Every component of our economy, businesses, manufacturing, jobs, and consumers depend on each other -- all hooked together like a train.  Government interference with the free market by setting wage rates can set off a long-run inflation that derails the train.  An American economic train wreck that undermines our ability to financially support the military is an answer to terrorist prayers.

 

Anonomous (don't need anymore government revenge)

 

 


We just received this from Jonathan Paton in Iraq.


 Here's two pictures I attached. On one of them you can see the smoke where we just targeted some insurgents.

    

Subject:
Thanks, Ann--thanks, Emil
From:
<tomjenney@cox.net>
Date:
Mon, 9 Oct 2006 13:48:56 -0700
To:
aseiden@goldwaterinstitute.org
CC:
franzi@insidetrackaz.com
 
I had a good time on Emil's show Saturday!

Call or write me anytime.omjenney@cox.net

--Tom

October 2, 2006
Just a note to let you know I'm doing O.K. I arrived in Kuwait yesterday and then took a C-17 transport to BIAP (Baghdad Intl. Airport). All told, from Ft. Bliss to Bagdad it took me over 24 hours to get here,
 so I'm pretty whiped out right now. The pictures I'm sending are of me in front of the "Victory over Iraq" Palace Saddam had built (it's right next to the site of the "Victory over America" Palace he was in
 the process of building until we blew it up).
 
Everyone's been really nice to me so far. It looks like I have a lot of work to do, though. We'll be working 12 - 16 hours 7 days a week.
 
I hope all is well.
 
Jonathan Paton

September 2006
From Dave Hanley in response to those constantly (and mostly ignorantly) bitching about Haliburton:

I have and can see no reason to complain about Haliburton. Every indication is that they are doing a much better and more efficient job than their predecessor, the lst Logistical Command ("The Leaning Outhouse") of Vietnam.   And an infinitely better job than the logistical elements of the Spanish-American War, Philippine War, World War I, World War II, and Korea.  (The 1991 Gulf War had its logistics done in a 
fashion similar to what Haliburton is doing today.)

Additionally, the monetary cost to the taxpayer is almost guaranteed to prove less expensive than the previous ways of doing things.  When a free-market contractor does a better job, he gets more profit.  This is in stark contrast to what happens in a governmental bureaucracy.

One can be pro-war or anti-war as one's conscience dictates.  However, it is an incontrovertible fact that the war exists.   And so long as it exists, logistical support is mandated-----unless one is sociopathic/psychopathic enough to want American soldiers and their allies abandoned.  Since Haliburton is providing said support and doing a good job of it, the intellectually honest person will NOT begrudge them their profits.

Regards,
Dave

NOTE: I always like to remind those who think Haliburton is some sort of GOP operation that the two of the largest stockholders are LadyBird Johnson and Harvard University.  EF

August 16
Emil,
just heard your one minute moment on 690.  Well done, well said.
Enjoy your show, tune in always when we are home.

Bruce and Maureen Thompson

August 15
Your 11 Aug 06 commentary on how the Palestinians fundamentally have no one to blame but themselves for their plight hit the nail on the head.  They have not just blown opportunity after opportunity, they have jolly well THROWN the majority of those opportunities.  Professional losers like that are not deserving of sympathy, let alone of support. 

However, that piece does not appear to have orginated with Dennis Miller recently.  Many sources on google attribute it to him but others insist it came from a certain Larry Miller on with Greta Van Sustern in 2002 or 2003.  As it cannot be found on the D Miller website, on his blog or in his archives, I rather imagine that the L Miller version is the correct one. 

Now Lew Rockwell says that such things do not matter.  So does Justin Raimondo.  But we here at thePALEOneoconconspiracydotcom must at all times adhere to the higher standards of H, H and R. 
(Hanson, Heinlein and Rothbard.)   So I thought I would set the record straight. 

Dave Hanley 

August 14,
From: Abi Behar-Montefiore [mailto:abi@tucsonjcc.org]
Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 1:32 PM
Subject: Message from Danny in Israel


Danny called in this morning. He is home with family and all seems to be quieting down.....let's hope.

He hasn't been emailing the past week but will get to his mail soon. Meanwhile - just wanted to let you know all is well. 

August 4
Dear friends,
 
It's been almost a week since we landed back in Israel and as I read your emails I can say that many waters have run in the Rillito River since we left Tucson.
 
The long journey home was as comfortable and un eventful as can be. Our kids (baby twins included) were admirably patient with us and no complains were noted from any of the other passengers or crew members.
 
We landed in to a half country at war. The north is living with a daily dose of rockets and the south (from the Hadera line - southward) is living its life, relived to be spared this time. Israelis today are either hosting or being hosted. 
 
As some of you may suspect I am officially a soldier again. The emergency draft system rang at my alternate phone in Israel through most of last Saturday, (as I was in the air on my way back) and a quick phone call to a friend clarified that we are drafted.
 
This was one of the most challenging weeks I have experienced. On the one hand, here we are, staying with my in-laws in safe Jerusalem, waiting for our  home to be vacated by the renters, car less, jobless and anxious to kick start our life again. On the other hand - there is a war going on and my friends are drafted and are gearing up in northern Israel. Being a father of five polarized my dilemma even further. Can I leave my family 2 days after we landed and join my buddies for the past 20 years or should I let this one go without me? After serious soul searching I went to check things out and for the first time found myself signing up on the M-16 with a shaking hand.
 
As we are uncertain how thing will turn out, I hope I will not have to push this scenario further and test my loyalties. I am a veteran of many Lebanon excursions. Many of the young reservists in my unit have never been there and I am trying to share as much of "street smarts" know haw and insights - hoping they will never have to use it.
 
I can not escape the temptation to be the Israeli commentator once again so here are here some of my observations so far:
 
A.  Israelis are coping courageously and logically with this crisis. No one is criticizing those who evacuate to the south as it is un bearable to spend 16 hours in a bomb shelter, listening to the booms when there is a safe alternative.
B.  As always in life - the poor and most vulnerable are the ones that hurt most. Citizens under assisted living were abounded by their care givers (mostly of foreign nationality who went back to their countries). Those who can not afford a hotel or who are lonely individuals,  found themselves stuck with no where to go. Only now the government and NGO's are identifying solutions for them.
C.  Rockets are a terror weapon as they are ineffective but terrifying in their randomness and suddenness nature. Unfortunately it took me only an hour drive to find out what's it like. Don't try it at home.
D.  The Israeli "Safe Room" is a big success. No one was killed in one.  
E.  When you hear a siren - take cover under concrete shelter and stay there for at least 15 minutes (just in case you will come and visit now).
F.  Hezbollah are far from being the un beaten guerrillas they claim to be but they deserve to meet ample fire power on the ground which at least in the beginning was not allocated. When ever they met Israeli troops they were defeated.
G.  As we learn time and again in the past decade - Air force doesn't win wars. 
H.  Our soldier's conviction that they are defending their homes and families is much stronger then Hezbollah's desire to associate with 72 virgins. How ever we will gladly grant them their desire.
I.  The young generation of Israeli soldiers is as committed and as good if not better then us old-timers. The problem is - they are the sons of my friends. Scary!!!
 
That's it for now. Please be alert and remember. Stormy times can come just like flash floods in the desert. 
 
Take care,
 
Danny Bobman

________________________________

From: Dan Bobman
Sent: Fri 7/28/2006 8:37 AM
Subject: Until we meet again...


This is it my friends.
 
Today is our last day in Tucson.
 
If you see me running around town/JCC with last minute errands - please stop and say Shalom.
 
These were 3 wonderful years that we will never forget and our friends had everything to do with that. 
 
See you all in a peaceful Israel and the sooner the better.
 
Shalom 
Danny  Bobman
(For the last time) Community Shaliach & Israel Center Director
 
PS
 
This Email address will continue to be active. I'de love to stay in touch.


 
 

 

July 4 -

I've read a few of your columns in Explorer.  Good stuff.  Your points are based on logic and reality. 
 
I thought the Star dropped the ball when they wimped out on Coulter, especially while keeping Dowd and Ivins.  She gave some conservative balance that they badly need.  Thanks for hanging in there.  I'll try to catch your radio show.
 
Roy Carter
Tucson

June 16 (another response to Duke - Todd is a Tucsonan member of the NRA National Board of Directors )

Duke,

 
I hope the tone of this email does not seem "short" but I am a bit rushed and will get to the point straight away. I am also writing this assuming you are a member of the "Friends" committee, if you are not then you should be.
 
On issue number 1, the committee can choose to hold it's banquet wherever it wants to. That being said it's a little late in the game to raise this type of concern now. If this is important to you I would suggest that you request that the committee have a banquet site selection committee, and that you be on it so that some of your concerns can be addressed WELL in advance of the banquet. Like a year in advance.
 
As far as issue number 2 is concerned:
 
This happens sometimes in politics. I hear about this type of issue quite often. As you are aware the NRA is a single issue organization we always try to endorse the person who will best represent our position on the 2nd Am. Those people that support the individual right to keep and bear arms. Occasionally that means endorsing someone who is wrong on other issues. It does not happen very often, but it does happen. I think it happens more often with incumbents than with new candidates because incumbents have a voting record.
 
Imagine a legislator who votes with the NRA on every vote, introduces legislation that gun owners need, maybe they even introduce the repeal of  bad gun laws. Imagine that this legislator also votes wrong on immigration, abortion, gay rights or some other controversial issue. Should the NRA not endorse this person? If you think the answer is yes, then where would we draw the line? Property tax increases? Income tax increases? Prayer in schools? The latest transportation plan? Speed bumps in your neig